Publication Ethics

The scientific code of ethics is a statement of the principles of ethics for all parties involved in the scientific journal publication process, namely managers, editors, bestari partners, and authors. The Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications upholds three ethical values in publications:

  1. Neutrality, namely being free from conflicts of interest in managing publications.
  2. Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those entitled to be authors.
  3. Honesty is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publications.

Publisher's Responsibilities:

  1. The publisher is responsible for publishing the manuscript after going through the editing, review, and layout process according to the publishing rules of Scientific Journals.
  2. The publisher is responsible for ensuring academic freedom for editors and bestari partners in their duties.
  3. Publishers are responsible for maintaining privacy and protecting intellectual property, copyright, and editorial freedom.

 

Editor-in-Chief Duties and Responsibilities:

  1. When necessary, determine the journal's name, scientific scope, scale, and accreditation.
  2. Determine the editor's membership.
  3. Recognize the importance of confidentiality for contributing researchers, authors/writers, editors, and reviewers.
  4. Apply rules and provisions for intellectual property rights, particularly copyright.
  5. Examine the journal policies and communicate them to authors, editors, reviewers, and readers.
  6. Create behavioral code rules for editors and reviewers.
  7. Publish journals on a constant schedule.
  8. Assuring the availability of financial sources for the long-term viability of journal articles.
  9. Creating a network of collaboration and marketing.
  10. Improve the quality of the journal.
  11. Prepare permissions and other legal aspects.
  12. The Editor-in-chief's decision is final based on the submitted article.

 

 

Editor's duties and responsibilities:

  1. The Journal Editor is responsible for deciding which manuscripts are suitable for publication through editorial board meetings that refer to applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, duplication, data fabrication, data falsification, and plagiarism.
  2. In the process of reviewing and accepting manuscripts, the journal editorial team is based on the principle of equal treatment in making decisions to publish manuscripts without distinguishing between the race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political ideology of the author.
  3. The editor and editorial team of the Journal will not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts or manuscripts except with the author's permission.
  4. The Journal editor's research will not use unpublished manuscripts for their purposes and will be returned directly to the author.

 

Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers:

Reviewers assist editors in making editorial decisions on submitted manuscripts.

  1. Responsible for the recommendations of the manuscripts he reviews.
  2. The review of the manuscript is carried out objectively and is supported by clear arguments.
  3. Responsible for quotations, references, duplication, data fabrication, data falsification, and plagiarism in the manuscripts reviewed.
  4. always maintain the confidentiality of information and do not use data from the manuscripts being reviewed for personal gain/interest.

 

 Duties and Responsibilities of the Author:

  1. The author must present the manuscript of his thoughts or research results honestly and without duplication, data fabrication, data falsification, or plagiarism.
  2. The author is responsible for the confirmation submitted for the manuscript that has been written.
  3. The author must indicate references to the opinions and works of other people quoted
  4. Authors must write manuscripts ethically, honestly, and responsibly according to applicable scientific writing regulations.
  5. The author does not double-submit to another journal while the process in this Journal is still ongoing.
  6. The author is okay with the manuscript undergoing editing during the review and layout process without changing the substance or central idea of the writing.