MENTAL TAX ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORK: EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF MENTAL ACCOUNTING IN TAX DECISION-MAKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70248/jakpt.v2i3.2104Abstract
This study highlights the role of Mental Tax Accounting in shaping tax compliance in Indonesia, where national revenue largely depends on tax collection. The main issue addressed is the low level of tax compliance, which is not only caused by economic factors but also influenced by psychological aspects, such as how taxpayers mentally process tax-related information. This study aims to develop a Mental Tax Accounting framework by integrating the concepts of mental accounting, cognitive biases, and social factors within the taxation context. This study uses a systematic literature review of 25 selected studies from the Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The findings identified eight key indicators: (1) mental tax categorisation, (2) cognitive biases, (3) fairness perception, (4) decision heuristics, (5) loss aversion, (6) mental framing, (7) emotional factors, and (8) social influence. The results indicate that behavioral economics-based interventions, such as tax communication redesign, system simplification, and the use of social norms, can serve as additional indicators for tax compliance compared to conventional approaches.
Keywords: behavioral economics, tax policy, tax compliance, mental tax accounting, fiscal psychology
References
Alm, J. (2019). Tax compliance and administration. In Handbook on taxation (pp. 741-768). Routledge.
Antonides, G., & Ranyard, R. (2017). Mental accounting and economic behaviour. Economic psychology, 123-138.
Bobek, D. D., Roberts, R. W., & Sweeney, J. T. (2007). The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of business ethics, 74, 49-64.
Burt, I., Thorne, L., & Walker, J. (2023). Reference points, mental accounting, and taxpayer compliance: insights from a field study. In Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research (pp. 139-167). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Dhami, S., & Hajimoladarvish, N. (2020). Mental accounting, loss aversion, and tax evasion: Theory and evidence.
Fitriandi, P., & Ahmar, N. (2022). Mental Accounting dan Kepatuhan Pajak: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Sikap, 6(2), 172-181.
Fochmann, M., & Wolf, N. (2019). Framing and salience effects in tax evasion decisions–An experiment on underreporting and overdeducting. Journal of economic psychology, 72, 260-277.
Gangi, F., Meles, A., D'Angelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2019). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 26(3), 529-547.
Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax authorities' interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New ideas in psychology, 37, 13-23.
Hartanto, R. (2023). Pengaruh Political Connections dan Foreign Ownership terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Perbankan di Indonesia. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(3), 2141-2149.
Hartanto, R., Rahayu, D., Maemunah, M., & Hernawati, N. (2025). Revealing perceptions of corruption behavior in indonesian higher education institutions. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(8), 2025390-2025390.
Javareshk, M. B., Pulford, B. D., & Krockow, E. M. (2024). Mental accounting in tax liabilities. Decision, 51(2), 153-164.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99-127). World Scientific.
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of economic psychology, 29(2), 210-225.
Muehlbacher, S., Hartl, B., & Kirchler, E. (2017). Mental accounting and tax compliance: Experimental evidence for the effect of mental segregation of tax due and revenue on compliance. Public Finance Review, 45(1), 118-139.
Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Mental accounting of self-employed taxpayers: on the mental segregation of the net income and the tax due. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 412-438.
OECD. (2019). Global forum on transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes.
Okoye, F. (2019). The influence of tax amnesty programme on tax compliance in Nigeria: The moderating role of political trust. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 11(7).
Olsen, J., Kasper, M., Kogler, C., Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2019). Mental accounting of income tax and value added tax among self-employed business owners. Journal of economic psychology, 70, 125-139.
Rahayu, D. (2023). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance dan Periode Terjadi Covid19 Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Perbankan Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akuntansi (JEMSI), 9(3), 762-773.
Rahayu, D. (2024). Personal Values, Ethical Orientation, and Ethical Behavior in Accounting Students as Prospective Professional Accountants. JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 10(1), 1-12.
Rahayu, D., Hartanto, R., Rohayati, I., & Harni, R. (2024). Fraud Prevention Strategies In Indonesian MSMEs: The Significance of Honesty And Internal Control Factors. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Perpajakan dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan, 1(4), 427-440.
Sheffrin, S. M., & Triest, R. K. (1991). Can brute deterrence backfire? Perceptions and attitudes in taxpayer compliance.
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 4(3), 199-214.
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral decision making, 12(3), 183-206.
UNCTAD. (2018). World investment report 2018 Investment and New Industrial Policies In United Nations Conference on Trade and Development’, Jenewa.
Wenzel, M. (2004). The social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law human behavior, 28, 547-567.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Perpajakan dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
