PENGUKURAN KINERJA: ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK PADA DATABASE SCOPUS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70248/jakpt.v2i3.2072Keywords:
Pengukuran kinerja, analisis bibliometrik, Scopus, VOSViewer, tren penelitian.Abstract
Pengukuran kinerja merupakan aspek krusial dalam pencapaian tujuan perusahaan dan telah menjadi fokus utama dalam penelitian manajemen. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perkembangan penelitian terkait pengukuran kinerja menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik berdasarkan database Scopus dalam rentang waktu 2011-2023. Scopus dipilih karena merupakan salah satu basis data akademik terbesar dan paling terpercaya. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis bibliometrik dengan perangkat lunak VOSViewer untuk memvisualisasikan tren kata kunci, jaringan penelitian, serta perubahan topik yang dominan dalam studi pengukuran kinerja. Dengan menganalisis 1.049 artikel, hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perubahan signifikan dalam tren penelitian pengukuran kinerja, dengan peningkatan jumlah publikasi terutama pada tahun 2018. Analisis sitasi juga mengungkapkan bahwa beberapa artikel memiliki pengaruh signifikan dalam bidang ini. Selain itu, penelitian mengelompokkan kata kunci yang sering muncul ke dalam beberapa kluster yang menunjukkan perubahan fokus penelitian dari waktu ke waktu.
References
Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002 Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A.,
Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
Bassioni H. A., Price, A. D. F., & Hassan, T. M. (2005). Building a conceptual framework for measuring business performance in construction: an empirical evaluation. Construction Management and Economics, 23(5), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619042000301401
Bititci, U. S. (1994). Measuring Your Way to Profit. Management Decision, 32(6), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749410065088
Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000a). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(7), 754–771. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010330739
Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000b). Designing , Implementing and Updating Performance Measurement Systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(7), 754–771. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010330739
Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003). Implementing Performance Measurement Systems: A Literature Review. International Journal Business Performance Management, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2003.002097
Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., & Mills, J. (2002). The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(11), 1288–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210450329
Chan, F. T. S., Lau, H. C. W., Ip, R. W. L., Chan, H. K., & Kong, S. (2005). Implementation of total productive maintenance: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 95(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.10.021
Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: An Australian study. Management Accounting Research, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1997.0060
Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a Technical Innovation Audit. Journal Production Management, 13, 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(95)00109-3
De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2001). Performance measurement systems Models, characteristics and measures. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(1–2), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358459
Deng, F., Smyth, H., & Anvuur, A. M. (2012). A critical review of PMS in construction: towards a research agenda. Procs 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2(September), 807–816.
Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001). 241. Ittner and David F. Larcker (2001) Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting a value-based management perspective.pdf. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 349–410.
Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Randall, T. (2003). Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 715–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00033-3
Neely, A. (1999). The performance measurement revolution : why now and what next ? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910247437
Neely, A. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(12), 1264–1277. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633648
Neely, A., & Bourne, M. (2000). Why Measurement Initiatives Fail. Measuring Business Excellence, 4(4), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040010362283
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Perpajakan dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
