THE ANALYSIS OF HEALTH WORKERS' SUPPORT AND PERCEIVED HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS FACTORS TO IMPROVE THE USE OF THE CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PROLANIS) IN DIABETIC PATIENTS IN KAMONJI PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER, PALU CITY.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70248/jophs.v2i2.2189Keywords:
Health Workers Support, Perceived Health Service Needs, Utilization Program, Diabetes MellitusAbstract
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the relationship between health workers’ support and perceived health services needs with the utilization of Prolanis Programs in diabetes mellitus patients in the Kamonji Public Health Center, Palu City. Methods: The research design used an analytic survey with a cross-sectional design. The respondent in this study is a Diabetes Mellitus patient who is a Prolanis Program participant at the Kamonji Public Health Center, Palu City. The sampling technique applied in this study was simple random sampling. 96 respondents were involved in the samples. Results: The results showed a relationship between the perceived health services need (p = 0.003), and there is no relationship between health workers' support (p = 0.862) with the Prolanis Program utilization. Conclusions: There is a relationship between perceived health services needs and no relationship between health workers’ support with the utilization of the Prolanis Program in Kamonji Public Health Center, Palu City. The Public Health Center is intended to develop Prolanis Standard Operational Procedures, both technical and administrative SOPs, to improve health worker collaboration and communication. Health workers are expected to be more proactive in providing guidance and promotion through education about Prolanis services.
References
Khurana I, Howard NJ, Maxwell S, Du Preez A, Kaipananickal H, Breen J, et al. Circulating epigenomic biomarkers correspond with kidney disease susceptibility in high-risk populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Oct 1;204.
Alba IGF de. Comorbidity in an Older Population with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: Identification of the Characteristics and Healthcare Utilization of High-Cost Patients. Front Pharmacol [Internet]. 2020;11. Available from: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85097595331
Atlas IDFD. International Diabetes Federation. Vol. 266, The Lancet. 2019. 134–137.
Zeng C, Luo H, Chen C, Guo L, Xu Z, Peng X, et al. Exposure to Maternal Diabetes Mellitus Causes Renal Dopamine D 1 Receptor Dysfunction and Hypertension in Adult Rat Offspring Fetal Programmimg. 2018;10:14–9. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.
Yosmar R, Almasdy D, Rahma F. Survei Risiko Penyakit Diabetes Melitus Terhadap Masyarakat Kota Padang. Jurnal Sains Farmasi & Klinis. 2018 Aug 30;5(2):134.
Henderson CE, Nezam H, Castillo KM. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–Recognized Diabetes Prevention Program After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. AJOG Global Reports. 2023 Feb 1;3(1).
Liao YS, Tsai WC, Chiu LT, Kung PT. Educational attainment affects the diagnostic time in type 2 diabetes mellitus and the mortality risk of those enrolled in the diabetes pay-for-performance program. Health Policy (New York). 2023 Dec 1;138.
Duan X. Epidemiological characteristics, medical costs and healthcare resource utilization of diabetes-related complications among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res [Internet]. 2020;20(5):513–21. Available from: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85071729019
Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.pusat data dan informasi Kementrian kesehatan RI. Tetap Produktif, Cegah Dan Atasi Diabetes Mellitus. In 2020.
Soekidjo Notoatmodjo. Promosi Kesehatan dan Perilaku Kesehatan Edisi Revisi. Rineka Cipta; 2012.
Friis K. Impact of low health literacy on healthcare utilization in individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and mental disorders. A Danish population-based 4-year follow-up study. Eur J Public Health [Internet]. 2020;30(5):866–72. Available from: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85092680698
Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2013 Tentang Jaminan Kesehatan. 2013.
BPJS. Panduan praktis Prolanis (Program pengelolaan penyakit kronis). BPJS Kesehatan. 2014;
Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Profil Kesehatan Sulawesi Tengah Tahun 2019. 2019.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV.Alfabeta;
Fahmi Idris. Panduan praktis Prolanis (Program pengelolaan penyakit kronis). Jakarta: BPJS; 2014.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 Tentang Tenaga Kesehatan. 2014.
Reski Widia Afrilla, Usman, Makhrajani Majid. Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Partisipasi Pasien Diabetes Melitus (Dm) Dalam Mengikuti Kegiatan Prolanis Di Puskesmas Lakessi Kota Parepare. Jurnal Ilmiah Manusia Dan Kesehatan. 2020 Sep 30;3(3):304–14.
Ginting R, Hutagalung PGJ, Hartono H, Manalu P. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pemanfaatan Program Pengelolaan Penyakit Kronis (Prolanis) pada lansia di Puskesmas Darussalam Medan. Jurnal Prima Medika Sains. 2020 Sep 10;2(2):24–31.
Abdullah Abdullah, Elly L Sjattar, Abdul Rahman Kadir. Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Penurunan Jumlah Kunjungan Peserta Program Pengelolaan Penyakit Kronis (Prolanis di Puskesmas Minasa Upa Kota Makassar). . Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Diagnosis. 2017;11(4):383–5.
Habiba LA. Habiba LA. Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Pemanfaatan Prolanis Pada Pasien Diabetes Mellitus Di Puskesmas Kota Makassar. . 2020.
Yuliaristi V. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemanfaatan Prolanis di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Mandala Kecamatan Medan Tembung Tahun 2018. 2018.
