TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION QUALITY BASED ON EDUCATION REPORT CARD: LONGITUDINAL INPUT-PROCESS-OUTPUT (IPO) ANALYSIS IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the transformation of educational quality based on the Education Report through a longitudinal Input–Process–Output (IPO) framework and to formulate a Four-Phase Educational Quality Transformation Model at SMP Negeri 4 Rasau Jaya during the 2021–2025 period. The research employed a descriptive-analytical longitudinal design using secondary data obtained from the Education Report platform. Data were analyzed through document analysis, longitudinal trend analysis, annual percentage change, cumulative growth analysis, exploratory correlation analysis, and cross-dimensional linkage analysis within the IPO framework. The findings indicate that educational quality transformation occurred progressively and non-linearly through four phases: recovery, strengthening, stabilization, and acceleration. Significant improvements were observed in literacy (from 25.00 to 83.33; cumulative growth of 233.3%), numeracy (from 34.38 to 80.00; cumulative growth of 132.7%), teacher reflection (49.3%), and learning quality. Correlation analysis revealed a very strong relationship between the input and process dimensions (r = 0.92), while the relationships between process and output (r = 0.30) and input and output (r = 0.33) were relatively low, indicating a time-lag effect in translating institutional improvements into student outcomes. In conclusion, the proposed Four-Phase Educational Quality Transformation Model extends the conventional IPO framework by incorporating a longitudinal perspective, demonstrating that sustainable educational quality improvement is achieved through cumulative enhancement of teacher capacity, school governance, and learning processes over time rather than through short-term interventions
References
P. Astuti and T. Haryati, “Mapping the Quality of Education Based on the Achievements of the 2024 Education Report at the Medono State Elementary School,” JGK (Jurnal Guru Kita), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 282–295, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.24114/jgk.v9i2.64395.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology, Guide to Using the Education Report and Data-Based Planning Platform (PDB) for Primary and Secondary Education and One-Roof Education. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2023.
D. Shintia, M. Asbari, F. Khairunisa, and N. Azizah, “Indonesian education report: Quo vadis quality of Indonesian education?,” Journal of Student Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 2020–2023, 2023.
T. T. D. Susanto, L. Syafruddin, and S. F. Abdullah, “Improving the quality of decision making through data-based management in schools,” J. Madinasika, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 235–250, 2025, doi: 10.31949/madinasika.v6i2.13723.
Curriculum and Assessment Standards Agency, “Indonesian Education Report 2025,” Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology, pp. 1–25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pusatinformasi.raporpendidikan.kemdikbud.go.id/hc/en-us/articles/6545029651609-Tentang-Rapor-Pendidikan-dan-Rapor-Mutu
X. Zhao and S. Lertlit, “Assessing the Input-Process-Output model for quality management in ASEAN universities: Perspectives of Chinese students abroad,” J. Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Univ. Jambi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 810–822, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v9i2.41668.
L. Kyriakides and A. Panayiotou, “Using educational effectiveness research for promoting quality of teaching: The dynamic approach to teacher and school improvement,” in Effective Teaching Around the World: Theory, Empirical, Methodological and Practical Insights, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2023, pp. 7–27, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-31678-4_2.
S. Belay, S. Melese, and A. Seifu, “Advancing teachers’ human capital through effective leadership and institutional safety: Mediating effects of professional learning and teaching climate,” Cogent Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1912488, 2021, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1912488.
J. M. Conejero, J. C. Preciado, A. E. Prieto, M. C. Bas, and V. J. Bolós, “Applying data driven decision making to rank vocational and educational training programs with TOPSIS,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 142, p. 113470, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113470.
M. Saimon and F. Mtenzi, “Reflective practices as the cornerstone for teacher development in the 21st century: Lessons from educators’ action research projects,” J. Res. Policy Pract. Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 88–100, 2021, doi: 10.37134/jrpptte.vol11.2.7.2021.
Z. Chen and R. Chen, “Exploring the key influencing factors on teachers’ reflective practice skills for sustainable learning: A mixed methods study,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 18, p. 11630, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811630.
B. Pei et al., “LearningViz: A dashboard for visualizing, analyzing and closing learning performance gaps—A case study approach,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00346-1.
T. Susnjak, G. S. Ramaswami, and A. Mathrani, “Learning analytics dashboard: A tool for providing actionable insights to learners,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 12, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00313-7.
S. Hidayat, D. Pratomo, D. W. Piandani, and A. Fitriadi, “Financial management in improving school quality based on educational reports,” J. Manaj. dan Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 239–248, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.fkip.unmul.ac.id/index.php/impian/article/view/4334
C.-H. Adolfsson and J. Håkansson, “Data analysis for school improvement within coupled local school systems: Which data and with what purposes?,” Leadersh. Policy Sch., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 714–727, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15700763.2021.2010101.
M. Ozdogru et al., “How does teacher self-efficacy mediate the relationship between student outcomes and principal leadership for learning? Results from meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM),” Acta Psychol., vol. 258, p. 105144, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105144.
T. Wang, D. F. Olivier, and P. Chen, “Creating individual and organizational readiness for change: Conceptualization of system readiness for change in school education,” Int. J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1037–1061, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2020.1818131.
Š. Javornik and E. Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, “Factors contributing to school effectiveness: A systematic literature review,” Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2095–2111, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13100148.
W. Admiraal, W. Schenke, L. de Jong, Y. Emmelot, and H. Sligte, “Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers?,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 684–698, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573.
H. Aifan, “Implementing a project-based collaborative learning approach using PowerPoint to improve students’ 21st-century skills,” E-Learning Digit. Media, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 258–273, May 2022, doi: 10.1177/20427530211030642.
Z. Yılmaz Bodur, A. F. Kılıç, and S. Aktan, “Perceived instructional environment and English achievement: The mediating role of student engagement,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 100–112, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2023.2203093.
Z. Salma, M. Nasution, and M. A. Panjaitan, “Development of teacher professionalism in the digital era,” Tarb. Bil Qalam J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.58822/tbq.v8i1.200.
R. Kaliisa and J. A. Dolonen, “CADA: A teacher-facing learning analytics dashboard to foster teachers’ awareness of students’ participation and discourse patterns in online discussions,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 937–958, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10758-022-09598-7.
D. P. Hardiyanto, I. Istaryatiningtias, I. E. Khuluqo, and I. Sandra, “Data-based planning analysis for improving the quality of private elementary schools,” Naradidik J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 468–476, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.24036/nara.v4i3.365.
M. Sun, A. I. Kennedy, and S. Loeb, “The longitudinal effects of school improvement grants,” Educ. Eval. Policy Anal., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 647–667, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3102/01623737211012440.
G. A. Koh, H. Askell-Williams, and S. Barr, “Sustaining school improvement initiatives: Advice from educational leaders,” Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 298–330, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130.
M. Syukri and Muammar, “Continuous quality improvement and quality standards,” VISA J. Vis. Ideas, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 15–25, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.47467/visa.v4i2.1579.
S. Viano and M. M. Yurkofsky, “Adapting a school improvement partnership before and during COVID-19: A case study of the resilience of improvement science to complexity,” J. Educ. Adm., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 623–637, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JEA-10-2023-0257.
